Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 00:09

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
What’s next?
What are some popular AI tools used for SEO?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Why do you think Islam oppresses women when Christianity clearly does it more?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
U.S. economy stalled in May, Fed survey finds - MarketWatch
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Eyeglasses With Built-In Hearing Aids: This Just Makes Sense - WSJ
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
ESA studying impacts of proposed NASA budget cuts - SpaceNews
Let’s just make it real clear:
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Why do most people care so much about what others think? Are they afraid of society norms?
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Can a teenager take boron? (Read my comment below for more context if you wish)